Is Apple the new Toyota of Tech.

Creatix / June 17, 2025

Toyota Motor Corporation is a Japanese multinational automotive manufacturer headquartered in Toyota City, Japan. Founded in 1937, it is one of the largest automakers in the world by production volume and revenue. Toyota is renowned for its commitment to quality, reliability, and innovation in manufacturing, particularly through its pioneering "Toyota Production System," which introduced lean manufacturing and just-in-time principles. The company produces a wide range of vehicles under brands such as Toyota, Lexus, and Daihatsu, and has been a global leader in hybrid technology with models like the Prius. With a strong global footprint and a growing focus on electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles, Toyota continues to shape the future of mobility while maintaining its reputation for durable, efficient transportation.

Apple Inc. is a global technology company headquartered in Cupertino, California, known for designing, manufacturing, and selling innovative consumer electronics, software, and services. Its flagship products include the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, and AirPods, all integrated through a proprietary ecosystem centered on iOS and macOS. Apple also generates substantial revenue through its high-margin services division, including the App Store, iCloud, Apple Music, and Apple Pay. Renowned for its sleek design, brand loyalty, and ecosystem lock-in, Apple is one of the most valuable and influential companies in the world, with a market capitalization exceeding $3 trillion.

Apple, much like Toyota, has built its global dominance not through constant reinvention, but through an unwavering commitment to quality, reliability, and user trust. While no longer the most radical innovator in tech, Apple leads in product refinement, seamless integration, and customer satisfaction—mirroring Toyota’s mastery of incremental improvement and manufacturing excellence. Both companies prioritize safety—Toyota through vehicle engineering, and Apple through privacy protections and secure hardware-software integration. In their respective industries, they set the benchmark for quality and long-term value, not by being first, but by being the most dependable and trusted.

Apple remains a world-class company with a fortress balance sheet, unmatched brand loyalty, and steady profitability, making it a safe bet to remain solid and profitable in the years ahead. However, as a stock, Apple may be significantly overvalued at 33 times earnings, a valuation more appropriate for high-growth innovators than for mature value companies. Apple today more closely resembles Berkshire Hathaway—a disciplined, cash-generating machine—than a disruptive force like OpenAI. Its growth has plateaued, its innovation has become incremental, and its reliance on the iPhone underscores its transition from a tech disruptor to a consumer staples titan. As such, its valuation should reflect stability and cash flow, not speculative growth.

Apple is currently trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of around 33, a level typically reserved for high-growth tech companies, despite its shift toward being a mature, stable business. Wall Street may soon begin to value Apple as a solid mature company. Perhaps valuation should be closer for now to a 20 to 25 P/E multiple range. With trailing 12-month earnings of about $6.50 per share, a re-rating to a 20x multiple would imply a share price closer to $130, while a 25x multiple suggests $160. This potential valuation reset highlights a significant risk for Apple shareholders in the near future. Despite Apple’s enduring strength, at the current $198 per share Apple may be priced significantly above what its current growth prospects justify.

Apple's Underwhelming WWDC 2025: Cosmetic Tweaks

Red lipstick on a beautiful golden pig. Apple’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) 2025 was a major flop. It felt like a mild refresh of Apple's existing technologies without any significant innovation. The headline feature, “Liquid Glass,” offered a fresh visual redesign across iOS and macOS that was largely cosmetic. Liquid Glass is meant to be a unified, translucent UI language across iOS 26 and all Apple platforms, featuring glass-like elements that reflect and refract based on context news.com.au+15gq.com+15design-milk.com+15. While praised for bringing expressive depth and aesthetic polish, critics warn its transparency can hinder readability in everyday use reddit.com. The real disappointment came from the lackluster AI updates: significant upgrades to Siri and Apple Intelligence were delayed yet again, offering only incremental improvements like live AI translation and call screening (investors.com). Apple’s Live AI Translation will offer real-time translation across phone calls, FaceTime conversations, and text-based communication in Messages. The feature works entirely on-device. Spoken words during a call are heard in your language as you speak, and incoming speech is translated aloud; text messages are translated live as you type and receive responses instantly. This will make the world feel smaller allowing a biblical-like communication worldwide. However, this is nothing new and "everybody" else will offer it. Analysts branded the keynote a “dud” and a “yawner,”. Investors and enthusiasts are equally concerned that Apple is now a giant that completely lost, not its strength, but its youthful mojo. Apple is seens as falling significantly behind rivals like Google and the Microsoft / OpenAI tag team. (businessinsider.com).

iPhone 17 Rumors: Safe and Boring

Meanwhile, whispers around the iPhone 17 suggest another cycle of modest upgrades featuring larger screens, wider ProMotion rollout, a possible “Air” variant, and an aluminum body (macrumors.com). There is practically zero net excitement over the upcomng model. Rumors include conflicting leaks (e.g., uncertainty about adaptive refresh vs fixed 120Hz panels) and expectations are low (reddit.com). For many, the rumored specs feel incremental and insufficient to drive a new “super-cycle” of upgrades (businessinsider.com).

Designed in California. Made in China: Bad News Squared

The tariffs on Chinese-made goods are clearly hurting Apple, as much of its high-margin hardware—iPhones, iPads, Macs, AirPods—is assembled in China and now subject to steep U.S. import duties. The tariffs are expected to cost Apple roughly almost $1B per quarter, pressuring its gross margins and forcing it to cut share buybacks while accelerating shifts in production to India and Vietnam (investopedia.com). In essence, what was once a competitive advantage—China’s efficient, well‑oiled supply chain—is becoming a cost liability, undermining Apple’s bottom line and diminishing its flexibility to invest elsewhere. Apple's home state of California is also under a lot of pressure in all fronts, from wildfires to immigration upheavals, and a super high cost of living. Apple employees remain disappointed about the return to office, which forced high talent out. Many employees may be eventually replaced with AI even at Apple, the proverbial late comer to the AI party.

🧭 Bottom Line

Analysts and consumers alike are unimpressed. WWDC offered aesthetics over advancement, and iPhone 17 leaks point to evolution—not revolution. With AI integration lagging and no major hardware leap expected, enthusiasm is tame. Apple may need a bold surprise or breakthrough—or risk losing momentum.

Is Apple the Toyota of Technology?

✅ What the Comparison Means

Calling Apple the “Toyota of tech” suggests Apple has shifted from:

Innovation leader → Incremental improver
Risk-taking disruptor → Operational perfectionist
Cultural trendsetter → Mainstream staple

Toyota is known for:

Relentless reliability and quality
Engineering excellence without flash
Market dominance through efficiency, not excitement

Apple increasingly echoes this:

iPhones evolve incrementally year after year
Macs and iPads are refined, not reinvented
Focus is now on ecosystem lock-in and margin defense — not frontier-pushing breakthroughs

📉 iPhone 17 Disappointment Echoes This

Recent rumors about the iPhone 17 (or the “iPhone 16s”) hint at:

Small cosmetic upgrades, like thinner bezels or minor design tweaks
No game-changing tech like foldables, neural interfaces, or AI-native hardware
Fewer surprises compared to Samsung or Huawei

This tracks with the idea that Apple is managing a mature cash cow rather than creating new categories.

📊 Valuation Comparison: Apple vs Toyota

Metric	Apple (AAPL)	Toyota (TM)
Market Cap	~$3.3 trillion	~$280 billion
P/E Ratio	~33x	~10x
Dividend Yield	~0.5%	~2.5%
Revenue (TTM)	~$400B	~$300B
Net Margin	~25%	~7.5%
R&D Spend	~$30B	~$11B

🤔 So... Does Apple Deserve a 33x P/E?

If Apple = Toyota in spirit, a P/E of 7–10x would be more consistent with:

Slow revenue growth
A saturated market
No obvious new product category breakout
Heavy dependence on one product line (iPhone = ~50% of sales)

But Apple trades at a premium because of:

Brand loyalty and global market power
Massive ecosystem and services margins (e.g., App Store, iCloud, AppleCare)
$100B+ annual free cash flow
The psychological effect of being seen as a “forever stock”

🔮 Final Verdict

Apple is behaving like Toyota — a world-class, risk-averse executor of established products. That makes it more predictable, but also potentially overvalued at 33x earnings unless it:

Launches a truly disruptive new product (e.g. Apple AI glasses, car, etc.),
Supercharges services or ads with AI (à la Google),
Captures major market share in health, payments, or VR.

If none of those happen, it could gradually de-rate to 15–20x earnings — or lower — especially in a higher-interest-rate environment triggered by upcoming inflation from tariffs and reduced immigration labor.

Is it time to begin shorting Apple? We believe so. What do you think?

Creatix Blogger

Search This Blog