Trump has a mandate to destroy the economy and build a new one that can defeat China.

March 28, 2025

In the 1990s, Bill Clinton and Al Gore and liberal economists led the United States to embrace a globalization movement, promoting free trade agreements and economic policies that encouraged the offshoring of manufacturing jobs to countries with lower labor costs. This shift led to the closure of numerous factories across the U.S., resulting in significant job losses and economic hardship for many American workers. 

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), ratified during President Bill Clinton's administration, is often cited as a pivotal factor in this transformation. The Economic Policy Institute estimates that NAFTA cost the U.S. approximately 682,000 jobs, as factories relocated to Mexico to capitalize on cheaper labor. 

The offshoring trend extended beyond Mexico, with companies moving manufacturing operations to countries like China, which became the major beneficiary of liberal economic globalization. It was precisely globalization what financed China's development and resurgence as a threatening world leader. a major manufacturing hub by 1990. 

Globalization and free trade agreements were driven by the pursuit of lower production costs, leading to a decline in domestic manufacturing employment. Over the last 30 years, we got hooked to buying cheap Made in China products, first at Walmart, and later at all other stores as China became the manufacturer of the world. Even the iphone, the holy grail of American innovation, the #1 product in the history of humanity, is manufactured in China. Iconically and ironically, the iphone is "designed in [liberal] California, and made in [communist] China." 

As manufacturing jobs disappeared, many American workers found themselves unemployed or underemployed, forced into lower-paying service industry positions. Examples include working at Walmart retail or flipping burgers at McDonalds. The transition to a service-based economy left numerous individuals underemployed and depressed working in dead-end jobs. As conservatives killed the labor unions, workers were left out and betrayed by both liberals and conservatives. 

Globalization brought economic progress in the sense of making everything more affordable and increasing the size of the economy. However, it brought a mental health crisis that culminated in the election of Donald Trump and the democratic end of the American democratic experiment. 

Following the democratic mandate of the majority of American voters, President Trump is dismantling globalization and demolishing the current liberal economy. President Donald Trump is directing policies aimed at revitalizing American manufacturing and reducing reliance on foreign production. His administration's "America First" agenda includes imposing tariffs on imported goods to protect domestic industries and renegotiating trade agreements to favor American workers. For instance, Trump's proposed 25% tariffs on auto imports have garnered support from labor leaders like United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain, who believes these measures could benefit U.S.-based auto production. 

Trump's economic policies reflect a commitment to dismantling the progressive economic framework established by liberal globalization efforts since the 1990s. By focusing on protectionist measures and prioritizing domestic production, the administration aims to restore manufacturing jobs, strengthen the middle class, and fulfill the promise to "Make America Great Again."

Critics argue that such protectionist policies could lead to trade wars and increased consumer prices. That is completely true. Something's gotta give. Prices will dramatically increase. Americans will have to quit the retail addiction of buying cheap foreign products. Forget about Walmart and Amazon, which can be considered economic "traitors" for leading in the flooding sales of Chinese and foreign products. 

If we truly want to make America great again, we have to quit subsidizing China at the expense of the American worker. There should not be any cheap goods Made in China or elsewhere sold in the United States. Gradually, Trump should continue increasing the taxes on Chinese and foreign products. All that can be produced here in the United States. 

Trump's Demolition Plan is Working

As of March 28, 2025, U.S. stock markets are experiencing significant declines, influenced by concerns over rising inflation and deteriorating consumer sentiment. We are living in a liberal economic and financial bubble created by globalization. President Trump has a democratic mandate to destroy our current economy to rebuild a different one. This is like demolishing an existing building to erect a new one. There will be dust and debris. There will be a huge hole in the ground. Eventually, the new construction will flourish from the ground up.    

Key Index Performances:

• S&P 500: The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is trading at $555.32, down $11.76 (-2.07%) from the previous close. The day's range spans from a high of $567.08 to a low of $555.27.

• Dow Jones Industrial Average: The SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) stands at $415.31, reflecting a decrease of $7.63 (-1.80%). It has fluctuated between $422.88 and $415.28 during today's session.

• Nasdaq Composite: The Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1 (QQQ), representing the Nasdaq, is priced at $468.57, marking a drop of $13.05 (-2.71%). The intraday high and low are $481.18 and $468.56, respectively.

Market Influences:

• Trump Tariffs: President Trump taxes on foreign products, while necessary and essential to make America great again, are destroying the current liberal economy built in the last 30 years. Americans got addicted to buying cheap products manufactured in third world countries profiting and developing at our expense. President Trump's 25% tariffs are hopefully just the beginning and will continue rising as we strengthen and rebuild our own American domestic production.   

• Inflation Data: The core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation measure, rose by 0.4% in February, surpassing expectations. This uptick has heightened concerns about persistent inflationary pressures. 

• Consumer Sentiment: The University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index declined to 57.0 in March from 64.7 in February, reaching its lowest level in over two years. This decline reflects growing apprehension among consumers regarding personal finances and economic conditions. 

• Corporate Earnings: Lululemon Athletica's shares have plummeted approximately 12% following a disappointing earnings outlook. The company's CEO cited decreased consumer spending amid inflation and economic concerns as contributing factors. 

These developments have led to a broad market sell-off, with investors exhibiting caution amid the evolving economic landscape of tariffs and taxes on foreign goods to end globalization and make America great again.

----------------------------------

What are Tariffs?

Tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods. Tariffs have been a longstanding tool in economic policy, serving various purposes from revenue generation to protectionism. Their impact on the economy is multifaceted, offering both advantages and disadvantages.

Advantages of Tariffs:

1. Protection of Domestic Industries:

   • By making imported goods more expensive, tariffs can shield local industries from foreign competition, allowing nascent or struggling sectors to develop and maintain employment. 

2. Revenue Generation:

   • Governments can utilize tariffs as a source of income, especially in countries like the United States where other forms of taxation require Congressional and democratic approval, which are challenging to implement. The revenue from tariffs can reduce the trade deficit, and reduce national debt. Revenue from tariffs can be used to fund public services and infrastructure projects including Elon Musk's space projects of Elon Musk. Monies paid to contractors can return as kickbacks for campaign contribution and for the upcoming coup.

3. Encouragement of Domestic Consumption:

   • Tariffs can incentivize consumers to purchase domestically produced goods by increasing the cost of imports, potentially stimulating local economies and reducing reliance on foreign products. Remember that even our allies today can become our foreign enemies tomorrow.

4. Negotiation Leverage:

   • Tariffs can serve as strategic tools in international negotiations, compelling other nations to modify unfavorable trade practices or policies. 

Disadvantages of Tariffs:

1. Inflation 

   • Tariffs are taxes. They are import taxes that lead to higher prices for consumers because  businesses typically pass on the additional costs to consumers. This impoverishes the consumer, reducing purchasing power, and potentially contributing to economic stagnation if the country is unable to produce domestically what it was acquiring from abroad. Imposing tariffs also provokes other countries to enact their own, leading to trade wars that increase prices and cause inflation for everyone.  

2. Inefficiency

   • Protectionism leads to laziness and complacency of domestic producers. Instead of letting the market make them sink or swim, tariffs protect domestic industries making them soft and less competitive in a global competition. 

   • Modern economies rely on complex global supply chains; tariffs can disrupt these networks, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs for businesses. citeturn0search0

3. Regressive Taxes:

   • Tariffs are considered regressive taxes, disproportionately affecting lower-income individuals who spend a larger share of their income on goods subject to tariffs. Tariffs are a tax on the poor and the middle class. The rich begin to buy more imports to show off their acquisition power and economic prowess.  

Conclusion:

Tariffs are taxes. As all taxes, tariffs are neither "good" or "bad". It all depends on how they are implemented and what they are used for. Trump tariffs are being implemented to dismantle, demolish, and destroy the liberal economic model based on globalization and free trade agreements. We tried them for about 30 years. They were a huge success for some and a failure for others. Those who felt left out and betrayed by globalization brought Donald Trump to power. 

Looking Forward:

President Trump is implementing the democratic mandate to dismantle, demolish, and destroy the current economic system to build a new one. No one knows whether Trump's implementation will work or not.  No one knows whether the current democracy will survive. We doubt it and think that the former American democracy died on November 5, 2024. The future has not been created yet. We'll see what we all create next in this creative matrix or creatix universe.

Moving ahead, many of us we'll be thrilled and happy building a new country if that is what the people want or what will serve the people. We're people helpers, here to serve the people. We have plenty of business intelligence to produce and share. Along those lines, never forget that military power is the most important of all. 

----------------------------------

Military Power as the Foundation of Economic Strength

Throughout history, military might has always been the bedrock upon which lasting economic power is built. The ability to project force, control territories, and secure resources has enabled nations to establish and expand their economies. This interplay between military dominance and economic prosperity underscores a fundamental truth: the power to engage in trade and commerce is frequently predicated on the capacity to defend and assert one's interests.

The capacity to wield military force allows a nation to protect its sovereignty, secure vital resources, and maintain control over strategic trade routes. Historically, empires with formidable militaries have been able to extract resources, enforce trade agreements, and create environments conducive to economic activity. The Roman Empire, for instance, utilized its legions to secure territories rich in resources, facilitating trade and economic growth across its vast domain.

In the modern era, the relationship between military and economic power remains evident and most crucial than never. A nation's ability to safeguard its interests, both domestically and internationally,  hinges on its military capabilities. This protection extends to critical infrastructure, trade routes, and access to global markets, all of which are essential for economic stability and growth.

The Role of Military Power in Global Trade

Control over trade routes and the ability to ensure safe passage for commerce are direct outcomes of military strength. Naval power, in particular, has historically played a crucial role in securing sea lanes and facilitating international trade. The British Empire's dominance over the seas during the 19th century allowed it to control key trade routes, underpinning its economic supremacy.

In contemporary times, nations invest heavily in their naval and air forces to protect shipping lanes and airspace, ensuring the uninterrupted flow of goods and services. We are still dependent on global trade although the plan is to become fully sustainable on our own. One of the biggest downsides of globalization is the dependence it imposes on international trade and the huge military cost it bring in enforcing that trade.

In America, we have been liberally dumb enough to get ourselves in huge debt keeping the sea trade lanes open for China and other countries to prosper to our detriment. For decades, the United States has played a pivotal role in ensuring the security of global maritime routes, a commitment that has inadvertently facilitated China's ascent as a manufacturing powerhouse. By maintaining open and secure sea lanes, the U.S. has upheld the framework for international trade, allowing nations like China to expand their economic reach.

We still have the most money, the most valuable currency for global trade, the US Dollar, because we have the most military power. If China were to become the top military power in the world, the Chinese Yuan would become the global currency for international trade. 

Money: An Artificial and Infinitely Renewable Resource

Never forget that money is a human invention. Money is 100% artificial (i.e. created by humans). At its core, money is a human construct—a symbolic representation of value agreed upon within and across societies. Its value is not intrinsic but is derived from collective trust and the authority of governing bodies. The value of money derives from the military power (including military alliances or "neutrality" constructs) of the issuer. This artificial nature grants money a unique characteristic: it is infinitely renewable. Governments and financial institutions have the capacity to create money, adjusting supply to meet the needs of the economy.

The issuance and regulation of currency are intrinsically linked to the authority of the state, which is upheld by military power or by recognized alliances with other military powers. The stability and credibility of a nation's currency are underpinned by the government's ability to enforce laws, protect property rights, and maintain order—all functions that rely on military and policing capabilities.

The Allocation of Financial Resources

Access to money is often contingent upon an individual's or entity's ability to generate economic value. Banks and governments allocate capital (give money) to those who demonstrate the capacity to multiply it, thereby contributing to overall economic growth. This allocation process is influenced by the broader economic policies and priorities set by those in power, who determine the frameworks within which markets operate.

In this context, economic power is not merely a function of market dynamics but is also shaped by strategic decisions made by those who control military and political institutions. The ability to influence these decisions can dictate the flow of financial resources, the valuation of assets, and the direction of economic development.

Conclusion

The intricate relationship between military might and economic power highlights a foundational aspect of global dynamics: the capacity to trade, produce, and prosper is deeply intertwined with the ability to defend and assert national interests. Money, as an artificial and infinitely renewable resource, serves as a tool wielded by those in power to facilitate economic activity and extend influence. Recognizing this interplay is crucial to understanding the mechanisms that drive economic systems and the distribution of wealth and resources on the global stage.

-----------------------

Meet our 29th Secretary of Defense, Honorable Pete Hegseth 

Recognizing that our military might is the most important money-maker of all, let's meet our honorable Secretary of Defense in the United States of Trump. 

Honorable Peter Brian Hegseth, born on June 6, 1980, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, is the 29th United States Secretary of Defenses. Mr. Hegseth is an American, conservative thought leader, former Army National Guard officer, television presenter, and renowned author. 

Raised in Forest Lake, Minnesota, Hegseth graduated as valedictorian from Forest Lake Area High School. He attended the Ivy League Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey, earning a Bachelor of Arts in politics in 2003. While at Princeton, Mr. Hegseth was the editor of The Princeton Tory, a conservative student publication, and played as a guard for the Princeton Tigers men's basketball team. Standing 6 feet 1 inch tall and weighing 170 pounds, he appeared in 42 games over four seasons from 1999 to 2003, averaging 1 point per game with a field goal percentage of 32%. 

During Mr. Hegseth's tenure as publisher of The Princeton Tory from 2002 to 2003, the magazine featured several articles that gathered significant attention to promote civil debate and discourse on the  privileged campus:

1. Killing Feminism:

   • In 2002, The Princeton Tory published a cover story titled "Killing Feminism: OWL sabotages the women's movement," which criticized the Organization of Women Leaders (OWL), a campus feminist group. The cover depicted a cartoon owl in a gunsight, and an inside page showed the owl with bullet holes and blood, leading to feelings of intimidation among some students. 

2. Unconscious Rape:

   • An article in the magazine questioned the classification of sexual intercourse with an unconscious individual as rape, arguing that the absence of duress in such scenarios complicates the definition. This perspective was met with criticism for its insensitivity toward survivors of sexual assault. 

3. Fighting DEI Initiatives:

   • The Princeton Tory also featured pieces challenging the university's emphasis on diversity, with some articles referring to it as "gratuitous glorification." These writings sparked debates about the role and value of diversity programs on campus. 

These publications led to heightened tensions between The Princeton Tory and various student organizations, particularly feminist and diversity advocacy groups, reflecting broader ideological divides on the Ivy League world during that period.

Military Career

Commissioned as an infantry officer in the U.S. Army National Guard in 2003, Hegseth's service included deployments to Guantanamo Bay, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He held various staff positions and was recognized with awards such as the Bronze Star Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

Pete Hegseth's military career spans nearly two decades, marked by multiple deployments, leadership roles, and commendations. 

Early Service and Deployment to Guantanamo Bay (2003–2004):

• After graduating from Princeton University in 2003, Hegseth was commissioned as an infantry officer in the Minnesota Army National Guard. In 2004, he deployed to Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, serving as a platoon leader responsible for overseeing detainee operations. For his service, he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. 

Iraq War Service (2005–2006):

• Following his return from Guantanamo Bay, Hegseth volunteered for deployment to Iraq. He served as an infantry platoon leader with the 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne Division. Initially stationed in Baghdad, he later operated in Samarra as a civil affairs officer, collaborating with local leaders to facilitate reconstruction efforts and governance. His contributions earned him the Bronze Star Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

Afghanistan Deployment and Counterinsurgency Instruction (2012–2013):

• In 2012, as a captain in the Minnesota Army National Guard, Hegseth deployed to Afghanistan. He served as a senior counterinsurgency instructor at the Counterinsurgency Training Center in Kabul, educating U.S. and coalition forces on strategies to combat insurgent activities. For his service, he received a second Bronze Star Medal. 

Service in the District of Columbia Army National Guard (2019–2021):

• After a period in the Individual Ready Reserve, Hegseth joined the District of Columbia Army National Guard in June 2019 as a major. He served until March 2021.

Awards and Recognitions:

• Throughout his military career, Hegseth received several honors, including:

  • Two Bronze Star Medals

  • Joint Service Commendation Medal

  • Two Army Commendation Medals

  • Combat Infantryman Badge

  • Expert Infantryman Badge

Controversies and Later Developments:

• In January 2021, Hegseth was slated to participate in the security detail for President Joe Biden's inauguration. However, he was removed after a fellow guardsman flagged his "Deus Vult" tattoo, a phrase historically associated with the Crusades and sometimes linked to extremist groups. Hegseth asserted that his tattoos were expressions of his Christian faith. 

• In January 2024, Hegseth resigned from the Individual Ready Reserve, citing disagreements over the handling of the inauguration incident. 

Hegseth's military tenure reflects a trajectory of leadership and service, interspersed with moments of controversy that have shaped his public and professional life.

In between the military service above, Mr. Hegseth obtained a Master of Public Policy from Harvard in 2013. In 2009, Hegseth enrolled at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government and completed a semester. He later returned and earned a Master of Public Policy degree. While at Harvard, Hegseth focused on national security and foreign policy, aiming to deepen his understanding of the strategic and political aspects of military operations. Specific details about his academic accomplishments or publications during this period are not readily available in public sources.

Media Career

Following his military service, Hegseth became the executive director of Vets for Freedom and later Concerned Veterans for America. These organizations focused on issues affecting veterans, advocating for conservative policies. In 2014, Mr. Hegseth joined Fox News as a contributor, providing analysis on current events, veterans' affairs, foreign policy, and national security. From 2017 to 2024, he co-hosted Fox & Friends Weekend, gaining prominence for his conservative viewpoints. 

During his tenure at Fox News from 2014 to 2024, Pete Hegseth, as a contributor and co-host of Fox & Friends Weekend, was involved in several notable controversies:

Axe-Throwing Incident (2015):

In June 2015, during a live broadcast on Fox & Friends, Hegseth threw an axe that accidentally struck Jeff Prosperie, a drummer from the United States Military Academy. Prosperie filed a lawsuit in 2018, alleging severe injuries due to negligence. The case was resolved in 2019 under undisclosed terms.

Criticism of The New York Times (2018):

In May 2018, Hegseth criticized The New York Times for allegedly not covering the capture of five ISIS leaders, referring to it as the "failing New York Times" as president Trump famously labeled the media organization. However, the newspaper had already reported on the story, leading to scrutiny of Hegseth's comments.

Advocacy for Presidential Pardons (2019):

In 2019, Pete Hegseth, then a co-host on Fox News' Fox & Friends, actively advocated for the pardoning of U.S. military personnel accused or convicted of war crimes. His efforts were particularly focused on three high-profile cases:

1. Army First Lieutenant Clint Lorance: Convicted in 2013 for second-degree murder after ordering his platoon to fire upon unarmed Afghan motorcyclists, resulting in two deaths. Lorance was serving a 19-year sentence at Fort Leavenworth.

2. Army Major Mathew Golsteyn: Charged with premeditated murder for the alleged killing of an unarmed Afghan man suspected of being a Taliban bomb-maker during a 2010 deployment.

3. Navy SEAL Chief Petty Officer Eddie Gallagher: Accused of multiple war crimes, including the fatal stabbing of a wounded ISIS fighter in Iraq in 2017 and posing for a photograph with the corpse. Gallagher was acquitted of the most serious charges but convicted of posing with the corpse.

Hegseth's advocacy included discussing these cases on-air and interviewing the service members' families, emphasizing what he perceived as injustices in the military justice system. Hegseth did not disclose his private lobbying efforts to President Donald Trump during these segments. 

In November 2019, President Trump pardoned Lorance and Golsteyn and restored Gallagher's rank, actions that ignited significant debate. Critics argued that these pardons undermined the military justice system and could encourage misconduct, while supporters contended they corrected overreach in prosecuting combat decisions.

Hegseth's involvement drew scrutiny, with concerns about potential conflicts of interest due to his dual role as a media personality and informal advisor to the president. This situation highlighted broader ethical questions regarding media influence on governmental decisions. 

Controversial Remarks on Women in Combat and Climate Change:

Hegseth expressed opposition to women serving in combat roles, asserting it could undermine military effectiveness. Additionally, he has been identified as a climate change skeptic, often questioning established scientific consensus on the issue.

These incidents contributed to a complex public profile for Hegseth during his time at Fox News, reflecting both his influence and the controversies surrounding his commentary.

Political Activities 

Hegseth was an early supporter of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and served as an occasional advisor during Trump's first term. He was considered for the position of Secretary of Veterans Affairs in 2017 but was not selected. In November 2024, President-elect Trump nominated Hegseth for Secretary of Defense. Despite facing allegations of sexual misconduct, financial mismanagement, and concerns about his managerial experience, he was confirmed by the Senate in January 2025, with Vice President J.D. Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. At 44, Hegseth became the second-youngest person to serve as Secretary of Defense. 

Marriage and Extramarital Affairs 

First Marriage: Meredith Schwarz (2004–2009)

In 2004, Hegseth married Meredith Schwarz, his high school sweetheart from Minnesota. Their relationship, which began during their teenage years, culminated in a wedding at the Cathedral of Saint Paul in Minnesota. However, their marriage ended in divorce in 2009 after Hegseth admitted to multiple extramarital affairs. 

Second Marriage: Samantha Deering (2010–2017)

Hegseth married Samantha Deering in 2010. The couple had three children together. Their marriage faced challenges when, in 2017, it was revealed that Hegseth had an extramarital affair with Jennifer Rauchet, a Fox News producer, which resulted in the birth of a child. This led to Deering filing for divorce in 2017, finalized later that year. 

Third Marriage: Jennifer Rauchet (2019–Present)

In 2019, Hegseth married Jennifer Rauchet at Trump National Golf Club Colts Neck in New Jersey, with members of the Trump family in attendance. Rauchet, an executive producer for Fox & Friends, had three children from her previous marriage. Together, Hegseth and Rauchet have a blended family of seven children. 

Throughout his personal life, Hegseth has faced public scrutiny due to the circumstances surrounding his marriages and personal sexual conduct.

Sexual Assault Accusations 

In October 2017, Pete Hegseth, then a Fox News contributor, was accused of sexual assault by a 30-year-old woman who was serving as a staffer of a conservative group during the California Federation of Republican Women convention in Monterey, California. The woman alleged that Hegseth took her phone and blocked the hotel room door to prevent her from leaving, leading to the assault. She reported the incident to a hospital nurse four days later and underwent a sexual assault examination. The Monterey Police Department investigated the claims but did not file criminal charges, citing insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

In 2020, Hegseth reached a confidential settlement with the accuser, paying her $50,000 without admitting wrongdoing. During his 2025 confirmation process for the position of Secretary of Defense, this settlement was disclosed, leading to intense scrutiny. Hegseth's attorney, Timothy Parlatore, characterized the accuser's actions as attempted blackmail during the #MeToo movement, asserting that the encounter was consensual and that Hegseth was a victim of false claims. 

In November 2024, The New York Times reported an email from Hegseth's mother, Penny, dated April 2018, accusing her son of mistreating women over the years. Although she later stated that the email was written in anger and defended her son publicly, this revelation added to the controversy surrounding Hegseth. 

Authorship

Hegseth has authored several books reflecting his political and social views:

"In the Arena: Good Citizens, a Great Republic, and How One Speech Can Reinvigorate America" (2016) is a memoir of the then 36-year old Hegseth, drawing inspiration from Theodore Roosevelt's "Citizenship in a Republic" address, famously known for the "Man in the Arena" passage. Hegseth uses this speech as a framework to discuss the virtues of active citizenship and robust American leadership. 

In the memoir, Hegseth intertwines personal anecdotes from his military service with a broader commentary on civic engagement. He emphasizes the importance of "good citizens" who are actively involved in public life and advocates for "good patriots" who support assertive U.S. leadership on the global stage. Hegseth argues that the American experiment, initiated in 1776, relies on the continuous participation and dedication of its citizens to uphold its foundational values.

The book serves as a call to action, urging Americans to embody the spirit of Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" by engaging wholeheartedly in the nation's civic and political arenas. Hegseth contends that such engagement is crucial for rejuvenating American exceptionalism and addressing contemporary challenges both domestically and internationally. 

Overall, "In the Arena" combines personal narrative with political philosophy, advocating for renewed civic involvement and a reaffirmation of America's role as a global leader.

American Crusade: Our Fight to Stay Free (2020): 

Advocates for conservative values and discusses challenges facing America. The book is another call to action for conservatives to defend traditional American values against what Hegseth perceives as threats from leftist ideologies. The book underscores a deep-seated conflict between conservative and progressive forces in the United States, suggesting that these differences are irreconcilable and may lead to perpetual discord. 

Central to Hegseth's narrative is the concept of an "American crusade," which he describes as a "holy war for the righteous cause of human freedom." This crusade champions "Americanism," characterized by opposition to movements such as feminism, globalism, Marxism, and progressivism. Hegseth posits that the survival of the nation hinges on the triumph of these traditional values over the aforementioned ideologies. 

The book also delves into Hegseth's critique of democratic processes, equating calls for democracy with leftist agendas. He expresses support for practices like gerrymandering to favor conservative candidates, advocating for Republican legislatures to draw congressional lines that disadvantage Democrats. 

Hegseth predicts dire consequences if progressive forces prevail, including a potential "national divorce" and civil unrest. He suggests that in such scenarios, institutions like the military and police would be compelled to take sides, potentially leading to internal conflict. 

In terms of foreign policy, Hegseth is critical of international alliances and organizations. He questions the efficacy of NATO, describing it as a defense arrangement for Europe underwritten by the United States, and calls for its restructuring. Additionally, he critiques the United Nations for advancing agendas he views as anti-American and anti-Israel. 

"American Crusade" has garnered attention for its unapologetic stance and rhetoric, with critics highlighting its confrontational tone and the potential implications of its advocated policies. Supporters, however, view it as a vital manifesto for reinvigorating and preserving foundational American principles.

Overall, the book encapsulates Hegseth's vision for a reinvigorated conservative America, urging readers to actively engage in what he perceives as a cultural and ideological battle to safeguard the nation's future.

Modern Warriors: Real Stories from Real Heroes (2020): Shares stories of American service members. This is a collection of narratives from fifteen distinguished American service members, including Navy SEALs, Army Rangers, Marines, Purple Heart recipients, combat pilots, and a Medal of Honor recipient. Drawing from his own military experience, Hegseth engages in candid conversations with these individuals, exploring their motivations for serving, definitions of sacrifice, coping mechanisms for loss, and the legacies they aspire to leave. 

The book provides a realistic look into the harshness of military combat, detailing experiences from various theaters of war such as Afghanistan, the Mediterranean, and Iraq. Through these firsthand accounts, readers gain insight into the challenges of transitioning back to civilian life and the profound impact of military service on personal identity. Complementing these stories are personal photographs from the battlefield and home front, offering a visual testament to the experiences shared. 

"Modern Warriors" serves as a tribute to the courage and resilience of American soldiers, providing readers with a deeper understanding of what it means to serve and the enduring value of the American construct of freedom.

Battle for the American Mind: Uprooting a Century of Miseducation (2022): Critiques the American education system.  Co-authored by Pete Hegseth and David Goodwin, the book presents a critical examination of the American education system, asserting that progressive ideologies have systematically replaced traditional Christian values over the past century. The authors argue that this shift has led to the erosion of foundational principles that once underpinned Western civilization.

• 
  

Key Themes:

1. Historical Shift in Education:

   • The book traces the transformation of American education, highlighting how progressive movements intentionally removed Christian elements from curricula, thereby altering the nation's cultural and moral framework. 

2. Consequences of Progressive Education:

   • Hegseth and Goodwin contend that the current education system promotes ideologies that undermine traditional values, leading to a populace less grounded in the principles of the American concept of freedom and individual responsibility. 

3. Advocacy for Classical Christian Education:

   • As a solution, the authors advocate for a return to classical Christian education, emphasizing the importance of virtue, critical thinking, and a curriculum rooted in Western heritage to counteract the perceived decline brought by liberalism and globalization. 

"Battle for the American Mind" serves as a call to action for parents and educators to reassess the philosophical foundations of schooling in America and consider educational models that integrate classical teachings with Christian values.

The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free (2024): In this book, Hegseth critiques perceived ideological shifts within the U.S. military, arguing that the adoption of "woke" policies and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have undermined traditional warrior values and compromised combat readiness. 

Hegseth asserts that these cultural changes have led to a focus on political correctness over military effectiveness, resulting in a weakened and "effeminate" armed forces. He is particularly critical of efforts to counter extremism within the military, suggesting that such measures have driven out patriotic service members. 

The book also addresses the renaming of U.S. Army installations previously named after Confederate soldiers. Hegseth opposes these changes, advocating for the restoration of original names like Fort Bragg, emphasizing the importance of preserving military heritage and legacy. 

Furthermore, Hegseth challenges adherence to international agreements such as the Geneva Conventions, questioning their applicability when facing adversaries who do not honor these protocols. He suggests that the U.S. should prioritize its own rules of engagement to achieve decisive victories. 

"The War on Warriors" serves as both a critique of contemporary military leadership and a call to action for reclaiming traditional military values. Hegseth combines personal war experiences with an analysis of current policies, aiming to highlight what he perceives as a betrayal of the men and women dedicated to national defense. 

Recent Developments

As Secretary of Defense, Hegseth is now in a position to make his vision of a more lethal and realistic American military. We need all the military might that we can get. We also need to be smart in how we spend our money. Our contractors will dry us poor if we let them. The key is not to outspend the enemy, but to outsmart it. So far, China has significantly outsmarted the United States having us overspending to keep sea lanes open for a globalization dominated by China.

The anti "woke" part of the American electorate woke up and gave a democratic mandate to President Trump to turn end the liberal globalization that made China a superpower. Hegseth's performance as Secretary of Defense will be critical to our success. If he does a great job, who knows, maybe he can become our next Vice President and President. 

In March 2025, Hegseth was involved in a security incident where sensitive military information was inadvertently shared via an unsecured messaging platform, leading to bipartisan calls for investigations into national security protocols. Mistakes are lessons and opportunities to improve. For Hegseth to deliver on the mission he needs to avoid major mistakes and make sure that his personal and sexual life doesn't erect a wall against him and success. 

-----------------------------------

The Hispanic community represents a significant and growing demographic within the conservative movement in the United States. This alignment is deeply rooted in shared values that emphasize family, faith, personal responsibility, and cultural traditions. Below, we explore core conservative principles and their resonance within Hispanic culture.

1. Family Values

Conservative Perspective: Conservatives uphold the traditional family unit as the cornerstone of society, advocating for policies that support family cohesion and parental rights.

Hispanic Cultural Alignment: Family holds the central spot in Hispanic culture, with strong emphasis on close-knit relationships, respect for elders, and communal support. This cultural priority aligns with conservative advocacy for policies that reinforce family stability and traditional roles, including the patriarchy and the dominant role of men over the supporting role of women. 

2. Faith and Religious Values

Conservative Perspective: A belief in a transcendent moral order, deeply rooted in Judeo-Christian ethics, guides conservative thought, emphasizing the importance of religion in public life and moral decision-making.

Hispanic Cultural Alignment: The Hispanic community is overwhelmingly Christian, with a highly conservative form of Catholicism being predominant, but with ample representation of evangelical Christianiy. This strong Christian foundation fosters a moral framework that mirrors conservative emphasis on faith-based values and ethical living under a Christian king. 

3. Personal Responsibility and Hard Work

Conservative Perspective: Conservatives advocate for individual accountability, emphasizing that success is achieved through hard work, self-reliance, and perseverance.

Hispanic Cultural Alignment: The Hispanic community often emphasizes the value of hard work and determination, with many individuals and families striving for better opportunities through dedication and effort. This ethos aligns with the conservative belief in personal responsibility as a pathway to success. 

4. Respect for Tradition and Cultural Heritage including deeply rooted Racism

Conservative Perspective: Conservatives adhere to customs, conventions, and continuity, valuing time-honored practices and institutions that have provided societal stability included racism.

Hispanic Cultural Alignment: Hispanic culture places a high value on traditions and ancestral customs including deeply rooted racism that favors the cult of whiteness even more than in the anglo community. This respect for tradition and racial order promoted by God resonates with conservative principles that prioritize cultural continuity and the preservation of traditional societal norms. 

5. Sanctity of Life

Conservative Perspective: Conservatives hold pro-life positions, advocating for policies that protect unborn life and uphold the sanctity of human life.

Hispanic Cultural Alignment: Hispanics have more conservative views than the general American public when it comes to abortion, reflecting a cultural emphasis on the sanctity of life given by God.

6. Community and Social Cohesion

Conservative Perspective: Conservatives uphold voluntary community engagement and oppose involuntary collectivism, emphasizing the importance of community bonds formed through shared values and mutual support.

Hispanic Cultural Alignment: Hispanic communities often exhibit strong communal ties, with a focus on mutual aid, neighborhood involvement, and collective celebrations. This communal spirit aligns with conservative views on the importance of community-driven initiatives and social cohesion. 

The convergence of these values illustrates the natural synergy between conservative principles and Hispanic cultural traditions. As the Hispanic population continues to grow in the United States, this alignment presents opportunities for deeper engagement and collaboration within the conservative movement.

Politically, the main problem with Hispanics is their socialist tendencies due to the influence of socialist governments in Spain and in other Latin American countries together with the comfort of getting free money from the government. However, Hispanics are not dumb and have witnessed the colossal failure of socialism in Hispanic countries like Cuba and Venezuela. Usually, reminding a Hispanic about Cuba and Venezuela is all it takes for them to quickly realize on their own that they are not socialists. 

------------------------------------------